"

25 Complex patterns of inheritance

By the end of this section, you will be able to:

  • Explain the effect of linkage and recombination on gamete genotypes
  • Explain the phenotypic outcomes of epistatic effects among genes
  • Explain the concept of pleiotropy
  • Explain why polygenic traits often exhibit continuous variation
  • Explain the concept of multi factorial traits and the role of the environment, and determining phenotypes

 

Note: Lecture Videos for this chapter are embedded throughout.

Linked Genes Violate the Law of Independent Assortment

Although all of Mendel’s pea plant characteristics behaved according to the law of independent assortment, we now know that some allele combinations are not inherited independently of each other. Genes that are located on separate, non-homologous chromosomes will always sort independently. However, each chromosome contains hundreds or thousands of genes, organized linearly on chromosomes like beads on a string. The segregation of alleles into gametes can be influenced by linkage, in which genes that are located physically close to each other on the same chromosome are more likely to be inherited as a pair. However, because of the process of recombination, or “crossover,” it is possible for two genes on the same chromosome to behave independently, or as if they are not linked. To understand this, let us consider the biological basis of gene linkage and recombination.

Homologous chromosomes possess the same genes in the same order, though the specific alleles of the gene can be different on each of the two chromosomes. Recall that during interphase and prophase I of meiosis, homologous chromosomes first replicate and then synapse, with like genes on the homologs aligning with each other. At this stage, segments of homologous chromosomes exchange linear segments of genetic material (Figure 1). This process is called recombination, or crossover, and it is a common genetic process. Because the genes are aligned during recombination, the gene order is not altered. Instead, the result of recombination is that maternal and paternal alleles are combined onto the same chromosome. Across a given chromosome, several recombination events may occur, causing extensive shuffling of alleles.

Lecture Video: Recombination, crossing-over.

This illustration shows a pair of homologous chromosomes. One of the pair has the alleles ABC and the other has the alleles abc. During meiosis, crossover occurs between two of the chromosomes and genetic material is exchanged, resulting in one recombinant chromosome that has the alleles ABc and another that has the alleles abC. The other two chromosomes are non-recombinant and have the same arrangement of genes as before meiosis.
Figure 1: The process of crossover, or recombination, occurs when two homologous chromosomes align and exchange a segment of genetic material.

When two genes are located on the same chromosome, they are considered linked, and their alleles tend to be transmitted through meiosis together. To exemplify this, imagine a dihybrid cross involving flower color and plant height in which the genes are next to each other on the chromosome. If one homologous chromosome has alleles for tall plants and red flowers, and the other chromosome has genes for short plants and yellow flowers, then when the gametes are formed, the tall and red alleles will tend to go together into a gamete and the short and yellow alleles will go into other gametes. These are called the parental genotypes because they have been inherited intact from the parents of the individual producing gametes. But unlike if the genes were on different chromosomes, there will be no gametes with tall and yellow alleles and no gametes with short and red alleles. If you create a Punnett square with these gametes, you will see that the classical Mendelian prediction of a 9:3:3:1 outcome of a dihybrid cross would not apply. As the distance between two genes increases, the probability of one or more crossovers between them increases and the genes behave more like they are on separate chromosomes. Geneticists have used the proportion of recombinant gametes (the ones not like the parents) as a measure of how far apart genes are on a chromosome. Using this information, they have constructed linkage maps of genes on chromosomes for well-studied organisms, including humans.

Mendel’s seminal publication makes no mention of linkage, and many researchers have questioned whether he encountered linkage but chose not to publish those crosses out of concern that they would invalidate his independent assortment postulate. The garden pea has seven chromosomes, and some have suggested that his choice of seven characteristics was not a coincidence. However, even if the genes he examined were not located on separate chromosomes, it is possible that he simply did not observe linkage because of the extensive shuffling effects of recombination.

Lecture Video: Linked Genes, Linked Dihybrid Cross.

CONCEPTS IN ACTION


Linked genes and how to use Dihybrid Crosses and Punnett Squares to determine if two genes are linked.

 

 

Epistasis

Mendel’s studies in pea plants implied that the sum of an individual’s phenotype was controlled by genes (or as he called them, unit factors), such that every characteristic was distinctly and completely controlled by a single gene. In fact, single observable characteristics are almost always under the influence of multiple genes (each with two or more alleles) acting in unison. For example, at least eight genes contribute to eye color in humans.

CONCEPTS IN ACTION


Eye color in humans is determined by multiple alleles. Use the Eye Color Calculator to predict the eye color of children from parental eye color.

 

In some cases, several genes can contribute to aspects of a common phenotype without their gene products ever directly interacting. In the case of organ development, for instance, genes may be expressed sequentially, with each gene adding to the complexity and specificity of the organ. Genes may function in complementary or synergistic fashions, such that two or more genes expressed simultaneously affect a phenotype. An apparent example of this occurs with human skin color, which appears to involve the action of at least three (and probably more) genes. Cases in which inheritance for a characteristic like skin color or human height depend on the combined effects of numerous genes are called polygenic inheritance.

Genes may also oppose each other, with one gene suppressing the expression of another. In epistasis, the interaction between genes is antagonistic, such that one gene masks or interferes with the expression of another. “Epistasis” is a word composed of Greek roots meaning “standing upon.” The alleles that are being masked or silenced are said to be hypostatic to the epistatic alleles that are doing the masking. Often the biochemical basis of epistasis is a gene pathway in which the expression of one gene is dependent on the function of a gene that precedes or follows it in the pathway.

An example of epistasis is pigmentation in mice. The wild-type coat color, agouti (AA) is dominant to solid-colored fur (aa). However, a separate gene C, when present as the recessive homozygote (cc), negates any expression of pigment from the A gene and results in an albino mouse (Figure 2). Therefore, the genotypes AAcc, Aacc, and aacc all produce the same albino phenotype. A cross between heterozygotes for both genes (AaCc x AaCc) would generate offspring with a phenotypic ratio of 9 agouti:3 black:4 albino (Figure 2). In this case, the C gene is epistatic to the A gene.

A cross between two agouti mice with the heterozygous genotype AaCc is shown. Each mouse produces four different kinds of gametes (AC, aC, Ac, and ac). A 4 × 4 Punnett square is used to determine the genotypic ratio of the offspring. The phenotypic ratio is 9/16 agouti, 3/16 black, and 4/16 white.
Figure 2: In this example of epistasis, one gene (C) masks the expression of another (A) for coat color. When the C allele is present, coat color is expressed; when it is absent (cc), no coat color is expressed. Coat color depends on the A gene, which shows dominance, with the recessive homozygote showing a different phenotype than the heterozygote or dominant homozygote.

Pleiotropy

Some genes affect more than one phenotypic trait. This is called pleiotropy. There are numerous examples of pleiotropy in humans. They generally involve important proteins that are needed for the normal development or functioning of more than one organ system. An example of pleiotropy in humans occurs with the gene that codes for the main protein in collagen, a substance that helps form bones. This protein is also important in the ears and eyes. Mutations in the gene result in problems not only in bones but also in these sensory organs, which is how the gene’s pleiotropic effects were discovered.

Another example of pleiotropy occurs with sickle cell anemia. This recessive genetic disorder occurs when there is a mutation in the gene that normally encodes the red blood cell protein called hemoglobin. People with the disorder have two alleles for sickle-cell hemoglobin, so named for the sickle shape (Figure 3) that their red blood cells take on under certain conditions such as physical exertion. The sickle-shaped red blood cells clog small blood vessels, causing multiple phenotypic effects, including stunting of physical growth, certain bone deformities, kidney failure, and strokes.

Sickle cell Anemia RBC
Figure 3: The sickle-shaped red blood cell on the left is shown next to several normal red blood cells for comparison. (CC BY 3.0; OpenStax College via Wikimedia.org)

Polygenic Traits and Continuous Variation

Most of the phenotypic traits commonly used in introductory genetics are qualitative. This means the phenotype exists in only two (or possibly a few more) discrete, alternative forms, such as purple or white flowers, or red or white eyes. These qualitative traits are therefore said to exhibit discrete variation. On the other hand, most traits exhibit continuous variation, meaning they exhibit a continuous range of phenotypes that are usually measured quantitatively, such as height, body mass, pigmentation in animals (including humans), and yield, water use, or vitamin content in crops. Even traits that are often taught as being discrete examples of single-gene inheritance, such as attached or unattached earlobes, are vary continuously. Traits with continuous variation are often complex, and do not show the simple Mendelian segregation ratios (e.g., 3:1) observed with some qualitative traits. Many complex traits are heavily influenced by the environment; nevertheless, complex traits can often have a component that is heritable, and which must therefore involve one or more genes.

How can genes, which are inherited (in the case of a diploid) as, at most, two variants each, explain the wide range of continuous variation observed for many traits? The lack of an immediately obvious explanation to this question was one of the early objections to Mendel’s explanation of the mechanisms of heredity. However, upon further consideration, it becomes clear that the more loci that contribute to the trait, the more phenotypic classes may be observed for that trait (Figure 4).

A set of three Punnett squares showing genetic inheritance patterns. The largest Punnett square on the left displays the results of a trihybrid cross between organisms with the genotypes ABC and abc, with all possible allele combinations for three genes (A, B, C) and their recessive counterparts (a, b, c). The two smaller Punnett squares on the right display simpler crosses. The upper right square is a monohybrid cross showing inheritance of a single gene (A and a), with possible combinations AA, Aa, and aa. The lower right square is a dihybrid cross involving genes A/a and B/b, displaying combinations such as AABB, AABb, AaBB, AaBb, etc.The figure illustrates how more genes result in greater variation in a single trait, as demonstrated by the increasing complexity and variety of the shaded cells in each Punnett square. The blue shading represents different genotypic or phenotypic ratios, with the trihybrid cross (left) showing much more variation (lighter and darker blues) compared to the simpler monohybrid (upper right) and dihybrid crosses (lower right).
Figure 4. Punnett Squares for One, Two, or Three Gene Trait. This is a simplified example of up to three semi-dominant genes, and in each case the effect on the phenotype is additive, meaning the more “upper case” alleles present, the stronger the phenotype. A comparison of the Punnett squares and the associated phenotypes shows, under these conditions, the larger the number of genes that affect a trait, the more intermediate phenotypic classes will be expected.

If the number of phenotypic classes is sufficiently large (as with three or more loci), individual classes may become indistinguishable (particularly when environmental effects are included), and the phenotype appears as a continuous variation (Figure 5). Thus, quantitative traits are sometimes called polygenic traits, because it is assumed that their phenotypes are controlled by the combined activity of many genes. Note that this does not imply that each of the individual genes has an equal influence on a polygenic trait — some may have a major effect, while others only minor. Furthermore, any single gene may influence more than one trait, whether these traits are quantitative or qualitative traits.

 

A series of graphs illustrating how the number of loci (genes) affects the distribution of phenotypes in a population. From left to right, the graphs show the distribution for 1 locus, 2 loci, 3 loci, and many loci. The first graph for 1 locus shows a simple distribution with three distinct bars, indicating three possible phenotypes. The second graph for 2 loci displays a more complex distribution with five bars, showing an increase in phenotypic variation. The third graph for 3 loci has seven bars, further increasing the variation. The final graph represents 'many loci,' depicted as a smooth bell-shaped curve, indicating a continuous range of phenotypes, resembling a normal distribution. The shading of the bars and curve transitions from white to varying shades of blue, emphasizing the increase in phenotypic diversity as the number of loci increases.
Figure 5. The More Genes that Affect a Trait, the Larger the Number of Phenotypic Classes Can Be Expected. For some traits, the number of contributing loci is so large that the phenotypic classes blend together in apparently continuous variation.

Lecture Video: Non-Mendelian Genetics, polygenic inheritance, quantitative trait, and gene-environment interactions.

CONCEPTS IN ACTION


 

 

Environmental Effects on Phenotype

In the preceding sections, we have explored phenotypes that exhibit a nearly perfect correlation with their associated genotypes. These traits are often governed by single genes with clear dominant or recessive alleles, resulting in predictable inheritance patterns as described by Mendelian genetics. For example, traits like pea plant flower color or human conditions such as cystic fibrosis demonstrate how a specific genotype directly determines the observable phenotype. In these cases, an individual possessing a particular genotype almost invariably displays the expected phenotype, assuming minimal environmental interference.

However, it is important to recognize that most phenotypes in nature are not determined solely by genotype. Instead, they result from complex interactions between an individual’s genetic makeup and the environment in which they develop and live. This means that even individuals with the same genotype can exhibit different phenotypes under varying environmental conditions. Traits influenced by multiple factors—including various genes and environmental variables—are known as multifactorial traits.

This concept can be conceptualized using the following relationship:

Genotype × Environment ⇒ Phenotype (G × E ⇒ P)

This equation emphasizes that the phenotype is not just a product of the genotype alone but arises from the dynamic interplay between genetic potential and environmental influences.

Understanding the interplay between genotype and environment is especially crucial in fields like medicine, agriculture, and evolutionary biology, where phenotypes have significant economic or health implications.

Many common diseases are multifactorial, influenced by both genetic predispositions and environmental exposures. For instance, certain alleles may increase an individual’s susceptibility to developing type 2 diabetes, but lifestyle factors such as diet, physical activity, and body weight heavily influence whether the disease actually manifests. This means that individuals with a genetic predisposition can potentially prevent or delay the onset of the disease by adopting healthier lifestyle choices.

Similarly, cancer development is often a multifactorial process. While some cancers are driven by inherited genetic mutations (e.g., BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes associated with breast cancer), many others result from interactions between genetic susceptibilities and environmental exposures to carcinogens. For example, a person with a genetic predisposition to lung cancer may only develop the disease if they are exposed to carcinogens like tobacco smoke or air pollutants. Therefore, not all individuals with the susceptibility genotype will develop the cancer phenotype; environmental factors play a key role in determining the outcome.

In agriculture, understanding genotype-environment interactions is essential for improving crop yields and livestock productivity. Farmers and breeders select for genotypes that perform well under specific environmental conditions. For example, developing drought-resistant crop varieties involves selecting plants with genotypes that allow them to thrive in arid conditions. However, even the best genotypes may fail to produce optimal phenotypes if environmental conditions are unfavorable, such as poor soil quality or extreme temperatures.

This genotype-environment interaction is particularly significant for polygenic traits, which are controlled by multiple genes, each contributing a small effect to the phenotype. For example, skin color in humans is a polygenic trait with a wide range of variation among individuals and populations worldwide. Genetic differences in melanin production and distribution account for much of this diversity. However, environmental exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation from sunlight can also affect skin color by stimulating the production of melanin, the pigment responsible for skin coloration. This process, known as tanning, is a protective response against DNA damage caused by UV light. As illustrated in Figure 6, increased exposure to UV light leads to the darkening of the skin, demonstrating how the environment can influence phenotype by modulating gene expression.

Skin tanning
Figure 6: Skin on the lower part of the arm is much darker in color than protected skin near the top due to the effects of UV radiation. (CC BY 3.0; Onetwo1 via Wikipedia)

Environmental factors can influence phenotypes not only by interacting with genetic predispositions but also by affecting gene expression through mechanisms such as epigenetics. Epigenetic modifications involve changes in gene activity without altering the underlying DNA sequence. These modifications can be triggered by environmental factors like diet, stress, and exposure to toxins, leading to changes in how genes are expressed.

An illustrative case is the Dutch Hunger Winter of 1944–1945, where severe famine conditions led to long-term health effects in individuals who were in utero during the famine. Studies have shown that these individuals had epigenetic changes in genes related to growth and metabolism, resulting in increased rates of obesity, cardiovascular disease, and other health issues in adulthood. This example underscores the significant impact that environmental factors can have on gene expression and phenotype, even across generations.

Another important concept in understanding genotype-environment interactions is the norm of reaction, which describes the range of phenotypes that can be produced by a single genotype under different environmental conditions. This concept highlights the idea of phenotypic plasticity, the ability of an organism to alter its phenotype in response to environmental changes (Figure 7).

For example, the water flea Daphnia can develop protective spines when exposed to chemical cues from predators during development. Genetically identical Daphnia raised without these cues do not develop spines. This demonstrates how the same genotype can lead to different phenotypes depending on environmental conditions.

In plants, genetically identical individuals can exhibit significant variations in traits like height, leaf size, and flowering time based on environmental factors such as light availability, water, and nutrient supply. Understanding phenotypic plasticity is critical for predicting how organisms may respond to environmental changes, such as those resulting from climate change.

The image shows three graphs demonstrating different levels of phenotypic plasticity across an environmental gradient. Left Graph (No Plasticity): Shows three horizontal lines representing different genotypes with no change in trait expression across the environmental gradient, indicating no phenotypic plasticity. Middle Graph (Plasticity): Illustrates three lines with a downward slope, indicating some change in trait expression with the environment. The red line decreases steeply, the purple line moderately, and the blue line slightly, demonstrating varying degrees of plasticity. Right Graph (Highly Variable Plasticity, Strong Genotype-by-Environment Interaction): Shows three lines crossing each other. The red line slopes downward steeply, the purple line slopes upward, and the blue line slopes slightly upward. This indicates high variability in phenotypic plasticity and a strong genotype-by-environment interaction. Each graph depicts the relationship between the environment (x-axis) and trait expression (y-axis) for different genotypes.
Figure 7. The image displays three graphs depicting phenotypic plasticity levels. Each line represents a single, unique genotype. The first graph shows no plasticity with horizontal lines, indicating no change in trait expression across environments. The second graph demonstrates moderate plasticity with downward-sloping lines, showing varying degrees of response to environmental changes. The third graph illustrates high variability in plasticity with lines crossing each other, indicating strong genotype-by-environment interactions.

 

Footnotes

  1. Sumiti Vinayak et al., “Origin and Evolution of Sulfadoxine Resistant Plasmodium falciparum,” PLoS Pathogens 6 (2010): e1000830.

Glossary

epistasis
an interaction between genes such that one gene masks or interferes with the expression of another
linkage
a phenomenon in which alleles that are located in close proximity to each other on the same chromosome are more likely to be inherited together
multifactorial trait
a trait that is influenced by more than one factor, including genetic and environmental factors.

pleiotropy
the production by a single gene of two or more apparently unrelated effects.

polygenic trait
a trait that is influenced by more than one gene; also referred to as a “quantitative” trait

recombination
the process during meiosis in which homologous chromosomes exchange linear segments of genetic material, thereby dramatically increasing genetic variation in the offspring and separating linked genes

sex chromosomes
sex chromosomes are a pair of non-homologous chromosomes which determine the sex of the organism; in humans the sex chromosomes are X and Y
wild type
the most commonly occurring genotype or phenotype for a given characteristic found in a population
X-linked / Sex-linked
a gene present on the X chromosome, but not the Y chromosome

 


Access for free at https://openstax.org/books/concepts-biology/pages/1-introduction
Access for free at https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Human_Biology/Book%3A_Human_Biology_(Wakim_and_Grewal)

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Introductory Biology Copyright © by will1278 and Various Authors - See Each Chapter Attribution is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.