Module 3: The Quantitative Fecal Exam

Module 3.2: The McMaster’s and Wisconsin Techniques

The McMaster’s and Wisconsin techniques

The McMaster’s and Wisconsin techniques are both quantitative tests but do have some differences that are outlined in the chart below. Please refer to pages 10-12 in your parasite lab manual for specific laboratory methods.

 

Table 3.1: Modified McMaster’s and Wisconsin Techniques

Modified McMaster’s

Wisconsin

Sensitivity
within 25-50 epg within <1 epg
When would you choose this test?
Expected egg numbers are >100 epg Expected egg numbers are <100 epg
Method
The flotation is a dilution technique and requires a special reusable slide (McMaster’s slide) with a grid and two chambers. Only eggs that are found in the grids are counted and applied to an equation to determine epg Double centrifugal float technique using a known amount of feces. All eggs under the coverslip are counted to determine epg. This is not a dilution technique.
Flotation solution
Depends, often Sheather’s Sugar Solution Depends, often Sheather’s Sugar Solution
Preferred technique?
The technique of choice for quantifying protozoan ova or when an animal is heavily infected with parasites because it is a dilutional technique. The technique of choice for quantifying helminth ova or when you expect that an animal has a low parasite burden.


Knowledge check

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Clinical Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory Copyright © 2021 by Erin Burton and Anna Lalande is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book